The Vaginal Mesh Helpline continues to report on the news that effects women with vaginal mesh complications. The new FDA tracking system comes a little late for the over 300,000 women implanted with vaginal mesh devices and suffering. However, there is hope. This sends a message that our voices have been heard. By filing vaginal mesh lawsuits and standing up for justice you protect yourself and all women from becoming targets of manufacturers who put profits over people.
FDA’s Propose Tracking System Could Reduce Vaginal Mesh Complications
The FDA has proposed a new regulation that would require all new medical devices to carry a unique device identifier (UDI). The UDI would be a code of letters and numbers. Such a code would make it much easier to track devices, which in turn would make it much easier to report complications with a particular model or to find out about such problems.
According to the FDA, “A UDI system has the potential to improve the quality of information in medical device adverse event reports, which will help the FDA identify product problems more quickly, better target recalls and improve patient safety.”
For example, if such a tracking system were in place, a doctor who had a patient with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and wanted to implant a vaginal mesh device could look up the different models by the UDI and immediately see what transvaginal mesh complications, if any, had been reported with each specific model. Likewise, in the event of a recall, a UDI would make the process much more efficient: the company or the FDA would simply announce that the model carrying a particular UDI number was being recalled.
The FDA’s proposal was a response to legislation passed by Congress in 2007 that directed the FDA to develop regulations establishing a unique device identification system for medical devices.
Many women have suffered transvaginal mesh complications
Such a system might enable future patients to avoid problems resulting from transvaginal mesh. Many women have suffered such complications, including pain, infections, mesh erosion, protrusion, vaginal scarring, dyspareunia, and perforation of the bowels, bladder, or blood vessels. Many of these devices were approved under the FDA’s controversial 510(k) approval process, which allows products to be approved without first undergoing clinical trials to prove they are safe.
If the physicians treating these women had been able to easily look up the type of vaginal mesh device they were considering implanting, and immediately see reports of problems associated with the device, they would have been able to weight the risks and make an informed decision about whether to implant that particular device.
Vaginal mesh MDL consolidated lawsuits
Many women who have suffered complications have filed vaginal mesh lawsuits in order to get compensation for their pain, suffering, and reduced quality of life. Most of these lawsuits charge that the manufacturers of these devices did not test them for safety before putting the on the market and failed to warn the public of the devices’ risks. A number of federal lawsuits have been consolidated in a vaginal mesh MDL in West Virginia.
For help call the Vaginal Mesh Helpline and Vaginal Mesh Support Group today, Let us help you find and vaginal mesh lawyer and doctor.
Tags: Alabama, Alaska, American Medical Systems, American medicat vaginal mesh lawyer, Anaheim, Arizona, Arkansas, Atlanta, Austin, Avaulta mesh complications, Avaulta Mesh lawyer in Alabama, Bakersfield, Baltimore, Bard Avaulta, Bard Avaulta device, Bard Avaulta vaginal mesh, Bard Avaulta vaginal mesh lawyer, bard mesh, Bard mesh lawyer, Biloxi, bladder mesh, bladder mesh lawyer, Bladder mesh lawyer Dallas, bladder prolapse, Bladder sling, Bladder Sling Attorney, bladder sling lawsuit, bladder sling lawyer, Bladder Sling Lawyer Dallas, bladder sling lawyer Philadelphia, Boca raton, Boston Scientific, Boston Scientific Bladder Sling lawyer, Boston Scientific Pinnacle and Uphold, C.R Bard, Ca, California, Carolina, Charleston, Charlotte, Chula Vista, Clearwater, Colorado, Connecticut, CR Bard vaginal mesh lawyer, D.C., Dallas, Dallas vaginal mesh lawyer, Delaware, Ethicon, Ethicon vaginal mesh lawyer, FDA warning, Florida, Florida Vaginal mesh lawyer, Ft Lauderdale, Ft Lauderdale vaginal Mesh lawyer, Ft Myers, Gainesville, Georgia, Gynacare mesh, gynacare mesh lawyer, gynacare mesh products, gynecare mesh lawyer, Gynecare vaginal mesh lawyer, Hampshire, Hawaii, Houston, Houston Bladder sling lawyer, houston vaginal mesh lawyer, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, J & J, J & J mesh, J& J mesh lawyer, Johnson and Johnson mesh, Kansas, Kentucky, L.A.Fresno, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, MDL, Memphis, Mesh erosion lawyer, Miami, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Modesto, Montana, Naples, Nebraska, Nevada, New, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, NYC, NYC Bladder sling Lawyer, Oakland, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, orlando, otjer women with the vaginal mesh, Panama City, Pennsylvania, Pensacola, Prolapse mesh, refer client for vaginal mesh, Rhode Island, Riverside, Sacramento, San Antonio, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Ana, sling mesh lawyer.vaginal vault lawyer, South, South Dakota, Stockton, surgical mesh, surgical mesh lawyer, tallahassee, Tampa, Tennessee, Texas, TOT sling, transvaginal mesh, transvaginal mesh lawyer, Transvaginal mesh lawyer NYC, tvt sling, TVT sling lawyer, Urogynecologist, Utah, vagina mesh helpline, vagina mesh lawyer, vaginal emsh lawyer, vaginal mesh, vaginal mesh chat, vaginal mesh comments, vaginal mesh doctor, vaginal mesh group, vaginal mesh lawyer, vaginal mesh lead counsel, Vaginal mesh MDL lawyer, vaginal mesh network, Vaginal mesh News, Vaginal Mesh Problems, vaginal mesh support, vaginal mesh support group, vaginal sling lawyer, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West palm beach, West Virgiania Mesh lawyer, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming