Posts Tagged ‘Modesto’

Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Filing Nationwide Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Written by Vaginal Mesh Helpline on . Posted in Vaginal Mesh News

Vaginal Mesh helpline, vaginal mesh lawyers are filing lawsuits for women injured by the vaginal mesh. If you have been rejected due to the statute of limitations or other criteria call the Vaginal Mesh Helpline to speak to one of our experienced mesh lawyers today.

The vaginal mesh lawsuit bellwether trials have begun and the mesh lawsuits are heating up. You must file your mesh lawsuit immediately.

What are the Transvaginal Mesh Complications ?

  • Erosion of vaginal tissue can result from a vaginal mesh
  • Hardening of the vaginal mesh
  • Infection is a serious mesh-patch complication
  • Pain and discomfort
  • Perforations of the bowel, bladder or blood vessels
  • Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) and Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
  • Urinary problems and more severe incontinence
  • Painful sexual intercourse
  • Potential injury to the partner
  • Feeling the mesh or pieces of substance in the vaginal canal
  • Vaginal mesh erosion
  • Increased incontinence
  • Lower back pain
  • Abdominal pain
  • Gastrointesitnal discomfort
  • Bladder and or bowel incontinence
  • Difficulty voiding and the need for self catherizations
  • Vaginal scarring

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits Are  Against These Manufacturers

  • C.R. Bard’s Avaulta
  • Ethicon’s Gynecare
  • American Medical Systems’ products:
  • AMS Apogee
  • AMS BioArc
  • AMS Elvate
  • In-Fast Unltra
  • MiniArc
  • Monarc
  • AMS Perigee
  • SPARC
  • Straight-In mesh
  • Boston Scientific Scimmed’s Pinnacle pelvic mesh
  • Covidien
  • Sofradim
  • Caldera
  • Mentor Corporation

To file a vaginal mesh lawsuit call us today.

 

Yaz Birth Control Pills Lawyers, New April 2012 Warning Date, Yaz Lawyers Filing Yaz Lawsuits

Written by Vaginal Mesh Helpline on . Posted in Vaginal Mesh Information

The VaginaL Mesh Helpline is keeping women updated on all dangerous drugs and devices harming women. Many women were injured by Yaz  birth control pills and thought that they were out of luck in filing a Yaz lawsuit. Yaz complications  include: Blood clots, stroke, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis and in some instances death. Many women with complications and families that have lost loved ones due to Yaz felt they could not file a lawsuit. But, new warnings issued in April pf 2012 has opened doors for an influx of Yaz lawsuits. We do not want you to be left out.

The FDA Ordered  Warning Label Changes For  Yaz Blood Clots

The FDA announced it was requiring a label change for  Yaz

On April 10, 2012, the FDA announced it was requiring a label change for Yaz which contains Drospirenone. This warning   announced that Yaz may be associated with a higher risk for blood clots due to Drospirenone. This warning date may mean you now have a Yaz lawsuit even though you may have been turned away before.

Yaz  Lawsuit Complications

  • Blood Clot
  • Stroke
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis

Blood clots from Yaz may be linked to an increased risk of stroke, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism injuries to the lungs.

A federal Multi-District Litigation court in Illinois set up to handle lawsuits filed over alleged Yaz side effects has reported more than 10,000 cases filed. The formal case is known as Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2100).

Yaz lawsuit lawyers are accepting lawsuits from women who have have suffered these  side effects after taking Yaz. Yaz blood clots have caused premature death in young women. This is another medical product that targets women. Women must stand up and demand justice.

Broken Marriage Engagement Due To Vaginal Mesh

Written by Vaginal Mesh Helpline on . Posted in Vaginal Mesh Stories, Vaginal Mesh lawyers

1000′s of women nationwide have had their lives seriously altered due to the vaginal mesh. The vaginal mesh has caused  their  live’s to become a physical and psychological downward spiral. We have spoken to women with complications that would make anyone outraged at these manufacturers. Women have lost jobs, careers, husbands , boyfriends and fiancees. Below is one women whose future went up in smoke.

AMS Transvaginal Mesh Victim Says Engagement Is Off

May 4, 2013, 10:30:00AM. By Jane Mundy

Seattle, WA: Debbie says that her engagement is off because of her American Medical Systems (AMS) transvaginal mesh implant. “I haven’t been able to have sexual activity with my fiancé without both of us experiencing pain and I don’t blame him for breaking off our engagement,” she says.

Debbie (not her real name) had the AMS transvaginal mesh implanted to treat urinary incontinence. But that has now become the least of her problems. “For the past year or so, I’ve had chronic pelvic pain, which is getting worse, and recurring bladder infections,” she adds. “Because of the inability to have sexual intimacy with my fiancé, I am also suffering from depression and weight gain – this transvaginal mesh has caused my life to become a physical and psychological downward spiral.

“Not only is my overall health suffering, but I am also in financial straights due to all the time I have missed from work, getting tests and lab work and trying to find a doctor to take out this mesh – I don’t think that my doctor knows what to do.”

Debbie knows the mesh has to be removed but at the same time she is frightened at the thought of more surgery.

In March 2013, a New Jersey Superior Court jury awarded Linda Gross, a registered nurse, and her husband, Jeff Gross, $11.1 million in compensatory and punitive damages ($7.76 million in punitive damages) in the first transvaginal mesh trial in the country. (In re Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, Master Docket No.: ATL-6341-10, Case No. 291.) At the six-week trial, Ms. Gross, age 47, testified that she had 18 subsequent unsuccessful revision procedures following her initial transvaginal mesh surgery.

Ms Gross said that the transvaginal mesh had made her life after surgery a “living hell,” and she has characterized herself and thousands of other women who were implanted with TVM as “guinea pigs” to the vaginal mesh manufacturers. Her attorneys argued that Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon deserved to be held financially responsible to the fullest extent of the law for their actions. The jury agreed, and found that the gigantic drugmaker failed to provide adequate warnings. Further, they determined that the TVM maker intentionally committed fraud against Linda Gross regarding the transvaginal mesh.

An American Medical Systems TVM lawsuit was filed on January 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, Charleston Division (Case No. 2:13-cv-01083). This suit is just one of a multitude of lawsuits pending in the multidistrict litigation (MDL) entitled In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2325).

You Must file your vaginal mesh lawsuit right away. Many states with 2 year statutes will be up July 2013.

 

Coloplast Statute Stayed, Coloplast Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Filing Coloplast Lawsuits

Written by Vaginal Mesh Helpline on . Posted in colopast vaginal mesh lawyers, Vaginal Mesh News

If you have a Coloplast Mesh the Vaginal Mesh Helpline has good news for you. The Coloplast mesh manufacturers have agreed to stay the statutes. The big concern has been that many states with a 2 year product liability statute of limitations would by up in July and  thousands of women would have been left out of filing their mesh lawsuits. But, Coloplast mesh victims are in luck now.

Lawsuits for the Coloplast vaginal sling and mesh will continue. Coloplast mesh have the same complications as all Prolene mesh implants. Coloplast mesh include:

  • Coloplast Aris
  • Coloplast  Novasilk
  • Coloplast  Restorelle

Coloplast manufacturers and sells three different transvaginal mesh  for Uterine Prolapse:

  • Novasilk Synthetic Flat Mesh
  • Restorelle Smartmesh
  • Exair Mesh

The company also sells five different bladder sling products for SUI repair, including:

  • Aris Transobturator (TOT) Sling
  • Minitape Sling
  • Omnisure Sling
  • Supris Suprapubic Sling
  • T-Sling with Centrasorb

Coloplast Mesh Lawsuits are being filed by Coloplast Mesh Lawyers. Call the Coloplast Vaginal Mesh Helpline today

Other vaginal mesh lawsuits are being filed for:

  • Bard Avaulta Mesh
  • AMS Vaginal Mesh
  • Boston Scientific Pelvic Mesh
  • Ethicon Gynecare Mesh
  • Mentor ObTape Sling

Call the Vaginal Mesh Helpline today.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits Updates, Coloplast Tolling Agreement

Written by Vaginal Mesh Helpline on . Posted in Vaginal Mesh News

Vaginal Mesh Helpline brings you the latest news in the vaginal mesh lawsuits. Vaginal mesh lawyers are in the process of discussing tolling agreements. Ladies, this is very good news. That means the statute of limitations for filing your mesh lawsuit could be waived.

What Is A Tolling Agreement?

There is a statute of limitations  effecting your vaginal mesh lawsuit.  This  means many of you can lose the right to file your vaginal mesh lawsuit  in court after a certain amount of time has passed. Occasionally, it benefits both the plaintiff and the defendant to extend that period of time or waive it entirely. This is where a tolling agreement comes in. It is a legal document that affirms that both parties wish to dismiss the statute of limitations. So far, Coloplast has entered into such an agreement and we have hopes that other manufacturers will follow. States with 2 year statutes would be up in July and the one year states are done. This opens new hope for the women who may have been left out.

At the March 21 status meeting for the five vaginal mesh multidistrict litigations (MDLs) pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, counsel for the defendant mesh manufacturer Coloplast (MDL No. 2387) indicated that his client has entered into a “tolling agreement”—a contract providing that, until after an agreed upon date, the potential plaintiffs will hold off filing suit and the defendant will suspend the running of the statute of limitations. This is done by the corporations in the hope that something will happen during the agreed upon suspension time that is favorable to the ladies filing vaginal mesh lawsuits.

Other Mesh Manufacturers  Response To This

  • Manufacturer C.R. Bard (MDL No. 2187) indicated that  they are  not interested in entering into such an agreement.
  • Ethicon appears to be  is “willing to consider” a tolling agreement for mesh MDL Lawsuits.

It is important to file your vaginal mesh lawsuit without delay.

Coloplast Mesh Victims

Vaginal Mesh Helpline is launching a national campaign to reach all women with a Coloplast Vaginal Mesh who may have been turned away by a law firm due to statute of limitation issues.

 

Vaginal Mesh Trials Have Begun. Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Ready

Written by Vaginal Mesh Helpline on . Posted in Vaginal Mesh News

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits.

The Vaginal Mesh Helpline is keeping you updated on  new news regarding the Vaginal Mesh lawsuits. The vaginal mesh trials have begun. We are waiting, watching and hoping for justice for the thousands of women injured by all these Prolene mesh implants. The stories of pain and suffering we hear on a daily basis are horrific.

We must reach out to all women with a vaginal mesh to push you to file your vaginal mesh lawsuit now.

Have You Been Rejected By A Lawyer Due To Statute Of Limitation Issues?

Call the Vaginal Mesh Helpline. We may be able to get a lawyer for you. Yes, there are statutes of limitations for your state but, there are aspects of the law that may bypass these.  We do not want anyone to be left out. If you have been told by a lawyer that you do not meet “his” criteria do not give up. Call us and get another opinion. There are so many lawyers after mesh victims and as the trials proceed new allegations, criteria and injuries will start to be revealed. What was no 6 months ago maybe yes now. Do not give up hope and call us today.

You Must File Your Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Now.

The vaginal mesh lawsuits are being filed against five separate manufacturers. They are Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon division, Coloplast, American Medical Systems, C.R. Bard, and Boston Scientific.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Settlements

The first vaginal mesh trial against Johnson & Johnson  has begun. In March, the nation’s first trial involving an Ethicon mesh lawsuit concluded in the New Jersey litigation, with the jury awarding more than $11 million to the victim, including $7.76 million in punitive damages. (Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-10, Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey).

File Your Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit

If you have not filed your vaginal mesh lawsuit or have been rejected by a law firm based on His “criteria” or statute of limitations call the Vaginal Mesh Helpline today, We may be able to get you a vaginal mesh lawyer and a vaginal mesh doctor.

Vaginal Mesh News Update

A Joint Status Conference is scheduled for May 23rd regarding the thousands of transvaginal mesh lawsuits pending in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. The lawsuits have been formulated into five MDLs, which are entitled: In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2325; In Re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2326; In Re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2187; and In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2327.

Vaginal Mesh Bellwether Trials Set For 2013, File Your Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit

Written by Vaginal Mesh Helpline on . Posted in Vaginal Mesh Information, Vaginal mesh Lawsuits

Thousands of women with horrific and life changing side effects from vaginal mesh implants nationwide will begin to see justice in 2013. The bellwether trials are set to begin and you must get justice. If you have not retained a lawyer for your mesh lawsuit you must di it right away. You cannot wait. Women nationwide must stand as a group and every single one must file the lawsuit to get justice for all women. It is not about the money but, the message. Justice must be sought.

Bellwether trials involving vaginal mesh lawsuits will be in the news for 2013 and may well be the largest lawsuit of 2013.

Bellwether trials are set to begin in 2013 for the vaginal mesh which has caused severe injury to 1000's of women. Our vaginal mesh lawyers are  actively filing lawsuits in the mesh litigation and looks forward to the steps toward justice for women across the USA. Wome of all ages have been harmed. The youngest we have heard from is 33 and the oldest 87. These are daughters, wives, sisters, mothers and grandmas.

These bellwether trials will help  determine  how juries will  rule in similar actions.

Vaginal Mesh Bellwether Trials
These trials will take place in four multidistrict litigations underway in U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia.  C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2187”) will begin on February 5, 2013.

American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2325”) will begin on December 3, 2013. Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2327”) and Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2326).

Important vaginal Mesh Alert

The first trial for Ethicon vaginal mesh lawsuits will begin  in January 2013 in New Jersey Superior Court, Atlantic County division,

Judge Joseph R. Goodwin of the United States District Court in West Virginia presides over not one multidistrict litigation, but four, all involving transvaginal mesh lawsuits.

  • Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon division,
  • Coloplast,
  • American Medical Systems,
  • C.R. Bard,
  • Boston Scientific.

Judge Goodwin ordered C.R. Bard’s bellwether trial date to be February 5th, 2013. C.R. Bard specifically faces an MDL comprising 600 lawsuits. Avaulta Mesh’s MDL bellwether trials are scheduled for the same month.

Judge Carol E. Higbee, who presides over a sixth transvaginal mesh multidistrict lawsuit in New Jersey, set  trials to begin in November.

If you have not filed your vaginal mesh lawsuit you must do it immediately. Once the trials begin knew knowledge and facts will begin to be revealed and more injuries will mean many of the cases that may have been rejected will be viable. If a lawyer has rejected your mesh lawsuit due to some sort of decided pre-trial criteria you may still have a chance once the proceedings develope and injuries become apparent. We suggest you contact us right away if you have been rejected by a law firm to get a second opinion.

 

 

California Vaginal Mesh Helpline Launch, Seeking Women Who Have Not Filed Their Mesh Lawsuits

Written by Vaginal Mesh Helpline on . Posted in Vaginal Mesh lawsuit Lawyer, Vaginal mesh Lawsuits, Vaginal Mesh News

Do You Have a California Mesh Lawsuit? Do You Need a Vaginal Mesh Lawyer?

California is one of the largest and populated state in the U.S. The Vaginal Mesh Helpline is targeting California for the launch of it's new expanded campaign to locate women with a Prolene mesh. The beginning stages of the vaginal mesh lawsuit proceeding have begun. Deposition dates and trial dates are beginning to be set. It is important that women file their vaginal mesh lawsuits immediately. We are still hearing from women who are being told by their doctors that nothing is wrong. Some thing is wrong ladies. You have a Prolene mesh that is disintergrating in your body. Justice must be sought and you cannot be left out.

California cities that this vaginal mesh lawsuit first round  campaign will focus on by population density  Include:

Vaginal mesh lawsuit Los Angeles,  San Diego, San Jose,  San Francisco, Long Beach, Fresno,  Sacramento, Oakland,  Santa Ana and Anaheim, and Modesto.

The second outreach will include: the greater Los Angeles, CA area and
Vaginal mesh lawyer  Fresno ,Riverside, Bakersfield, Stockton, Modesto, Chula Vista,

The goal being to hook women up with a vaginal mesh lawyer and vaginal mesh doctor to put them in the best position for the vaginal  mesh lawsuits.

Vaginal Mesh Helpline is Watching the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit

Written by Vaginal Mesh Helpline on . Posted in Vaginal mesh Lawsuits, Vaginal Mesh News

The Vaginal Mesh Helpline is watching the movement of the vaginal mesh lawsuit as it progresses. We have a vaginal mesh lawsuit overview for you:

Update For the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

On August 22 and August 23, 2012, the Honorable Joseph R. Goodwin, who is overseeing the pelvic mesh multidistrict litigations currently pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, issued four pretrial orders in the following actions: In re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2325”); In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2326”); In re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2327”); and In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (“MDL No. 2187”).* The first three pretrial orders deal with the filing of complaints in the American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific Corp., and Ethicon MDLs. The fourth pretrial order sets forth deadlines for bellwether trial selection and related discovery in the C.R. Bard MDL.

Vaginal Mesh lawsuit MDL'S

Transvaginal mesh lawsuits in four related multidistrict litigations

 Southern District of West Virginia includes:

  •   C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2187 (619 cases);
  •   American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2325 (312 cases);
  •   Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2326 (207 cases); and
  •   Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2327  (278 cases).
     

Trials Set To Begin in the Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

The latest batch of bellwether trials in the Bard Avaulta MDL are set to begin in June 2013, according to Lawyers USA Online (http://lawyersusaonline.com/) (subscription required). The first set of bellwether trials are scheduled for February 2013.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Discovery Approved

Chief District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of West Virginia currently presides over four transvaginal mesh lawsuit MDL’s.  Judge Goodwin issued a pretrial order to authorize discovery processes for all four MDL’s, which consolidate litigation alleging vaginal mesh problems resulting from devices manufactured by against American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific, C.R. Bard, and Ethicon.
 

 

 

Botox New Hope For Urinary Incontinence, Vaginal Mesh Helpline Reports

Written by Vaginal Mesh Helpline on . Posted in Vaginal Mesh News

The Vaginal Mesh Helpline will keep you updated on all the most recent news. Our vaginal mesh network of lawyers is filing mesh lawsuits on behalf of women with a failed Prolene mesh. The mesh was used for urinary incontinence in 100's of women.

Published on Saturday 15 September 2012 21:02

Botox injections may help women with urinary incontinence, The Daily Telegraph has today reported. The newspaper said that injecting the muscle-freezing toxin into the wall of the bladder can have a long-lasting impact on overactive bladder syndrome, a major cause of incontinence.

The newspaper’s story is based on a UK medical trial that investigated whether the paralysing properties of botox were effective at reducing the symptoms such as frequently using the toilet, feeling an urgent need to urinate, and leakage in patients with overactive bladder syndrome.

The trial featured 240 women who had not responded to medical treatments for overactive balder syndrome. The researchers found that women who received the botox injection experienced these symptoms significantly less frequently than women who received a dummy injection of saltwater. However, women given botox were more likely to get urinary tract infections.

The results of the study indicate that botox may be effective in treating a common and upsetting health condition. However, if it does get adopted into use in this way there are several other treatment options (including lifestyle measures, bladder training exercises and medication that would be considered first. Botox may be considered as an option only if these treatments fail, and the benefits would have to be considered in relation to its potential harms.

 

Where did the story come from?

The study was carried out by researchers from the University of Leicester and was funded by the Moulton Charitable Trust and the women’s health charity Wellbeing of Women.

The study was published in the peer-reviewed medical journal European Urology.

The Telegraph covered this study appropriately, covering the study size and design, as well as the treatment benefits and harms.

 

What kind of research was this?

While it is hard to gauge the true scale of the problem, research suggests that around 13% of women in the UK may have some form of urinary incontinence. Although many conditions and factors can cause urinary incontinence, one major cause is overactive bladder syndrome. The condition is marked by uncontrolled contraction of the bladder that results in an urgent need to pass urine. While this can lead women to need the toilet frequently, some also experience a form of leakage called urge incontinence.

An overactive bladder can be a cause of urge incontinence, which is when urine leaks at the same time or just after you feel an intense urge to pass urine. Urge incontinence differs from stress incontinence, where the pelvic floor muscles are too weak to prevent urination. This causes urine to leak when your bladder is placed under pressure from actions such as coughing or laughing.

This was a placebo-controlled randomised controlled trial that examined the effectiveness and safety of using botulinum toxin (botox) as a treatment for overactive bladder syndrome. A randomised controlled trial is the best way to measure the effectiveness of a treatment, as the randomisation process helps to ensure that any patient characteristics that may influence the outcome have an equal chance of appearing in either treatment group. This allows researchers to be confident that any observed effect is due to the treatment under study.

 

What did the research involve?

The researchers enrolled 240 women with bladder muscle overactivity, or overactive bladder syndrome, that had not responded to previous treatment. The women were randomly allocated injections of either Botulinum toxin A (botox) or placebo (saltwater) into the wall of the bladder. Women with another common type of incontinence, stress incontinence, were not included in the study.

The participants kept a diary over three days, recording the number of times they:

    emptied their bladder
    felt an urgent need to empty their bladder
    experienced an unintentional passing of urine (or leakage)

The women also completed a questionnaire that assessed their quality of life, as overactive bladder syndrome often has a significant negative impact on patient quality of life.

The researchers conducted follow-up sessions with the women on average at six weeks, three months and six months after treatment. They assessed differences in the frequency of the above three symptoms between the two treatment groups. They also compared quality of life scores, treatment complications and time until troubling symptoms returned between the two groups.

The researchers used appropriate statistical methods to assess differences in frequency of symptoms between the two groups.

What were the basic results?

There were 122 women allocated to the botox treatment group and 118 women allocated to the placebo group.

The researchers compared the outcomes in the botox and placebo groups at the six-month follow-up. They found that in any 24-hour period women in the botox group:

    emptied their bladders less often: 8.33 times versus 9.67 times, a difference of 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 2.33, p=0.0001)
    experienced fewer leakage episodes: 1.67 versus 6.00, a difference of 4.33 episodes (95% CI 3.33 to 5.67, p<0.0001)
    experienced fewer episodes of urgency to urinate: 3.83 versus 6.33, a difference of 2.50 episodes (95% CI 1.33 to 3.33, p<0.0001)

Almost a one-third of women in the botox group (31.3%) developed bladder control (or continence) following their treatment, compared to 12.0% in the placebo group (Odds Ratio [OR] 3.12, 95% CI 1.49 to 6.52, p=0.002).

However, urinary tract infection was reported at least once during six months by a one-third of women in the botox treatment group, compared to 10% in the placebo group (OR 3.68, 95% CI 1.72 to 8.25, p=0.0003).

Those given botox also reported greater difficulty emptying their bladders, which required self-catheterisation to remove their urine: 16% of the botox group compared to 4% of the placebo group (OR 4.87, 95% CI 1.52 to 20.33, p=0.003).

 

How did the researchers interpret the results?

The researchers concluded that injections of botulinum toxin A into the bladder wall is an effective and safe treatment for overactive bladder syndrome in women who have not responded to previous treatment.

 

Conclusion

Urinary incontinence can be a distressing and problematic condition, and although we cannot be sure of the number of people affected, research suggests it is surprisingly common.

While there is a range of potential treatments and ways to manage urinary incontinence (including medication, bladder training, lifestyle changes and surgery) not all people respond to them, and they can have problems. This randomised controlled trial provided good evidence that botox injections may be a useful treatment option for women with incontinence due to overactive bladder syndrome that has proven difficult to treat with other methods.

The researchers say that the relief of symptoms reported by the participants was considerably better than those who used oral anticholinergic drugs. These drugs act on the nerve supply to the bladder and are the standard medical treatment used for this condition. They add that other randomised controlled trials have reported similar effects.

The researchers say that since they designed their trial, other studies have published results that support using a lower recommended dose of botox for this type of treatment. Therefore, it is unclear if the same results would be found at this reduced dose. They also say that their study recruited participants with severe cases of overactive bladder syndrome, and that it is unclear if the treatment would be as effective in less severe cases.

It is important to note that the study participants did not have stress incontinence, which is a common cause of urinary incontinence. Therefore, the results of this study cannot be generalised to all women with symptoms of overactive bladder or incontinence, but can only be applied to those with diagnosed overactive bladder syndrome (or detrusor overactivity).

Botox is not routinely used by the NHS in this way, but if it were then it would probably be considered as an option only among women who have required specialist referral for their condition. This would be given after they had tried other treatment options first, which may include lifestyle measures and bladder training exercises in addition to oral medications. If these treatments fail, the benefits of botox would have to be considered in relation to its potential harms.