Vaginal Mesh Helpline shares all the latest news regarding the vaginal mesh, pelvic mesh lawsuits and updates from vaginal mesh lawyers regarding the proceedings.
Vaginal mesh lawsuits involving Prolene mesh products manufactured by C.R. Bard, Inc., continue to move proceed in a multidistrict litigation U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia. In an Order issued on May 17th, the Court denied a request by C.R. Bard to seal emails that included supplier information the company claimed would reveal trade secrets and other confidential, proprietary information about its suppliers. The emails were filed as exhibits by plaintiffs in response to certain motions made by Bard, according to the Order. (In re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2187). Other lawsuit are also progressing for vaginal mesh complications against American Medical Systems, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corp.
Prolene Mesh Lawsuits West Virginia
C.R. Bard is only one of the manufacturers for which consolidated lawsuits are underway in the Southern District of West Virginia under Judge Goodwin. The first bellwether trial in the C.R. Bard multidistrict litigation is scheduled to begin in June, and will involve a Bard Avaulta transvaginal mesh lawsuit. Other litigations underway in West Virginia include In re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2325; In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2326; and In re: Ethicon, Inc. Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2327. The Vaginal Mesh Helpline is watching for continuous updates and will keep you posted.
Prolene Mesh Lawsuits In New Jersey
More C.R. Bard and other manufacturer vaginal mesh lawsuits have been consolidated in New Jersey Superior Court, Atlantic County. The first trial will begin in September 2013. (In re: Pelvic Mesh Litigation/Bard, No. L-6339-10, and). We also have Ethicon transvaginal mesh lawsuits here as well (In re: Pelvic Mesh/Gynecare Litigation, No. 6341-10) One of the ones we see in the news is (Gross v. Gynecare Inc., Atl-L-6966-10, Superior Court of Atlantic County, New Jersey). Gross filed a vaginal mesh lawsuit and was awarded just over $11 million for her suffering.
Victims the Prolene vaginal mesh, Transvaginal Mesh, Bladder Sling, TVT, Pelvic mesh and all vaginal mesh products causing complications should contact us immediately to discuss their rights and get support a lawyer or a doctor.